CVE-2026-94201Filtering an :atom attribute with unsafe_to_atom? can exhaust the BEAM atom table in Ash
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects ash-project ash. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.30%, higher than 21% of scored CVEs.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Ash stores :atom-typed attributes as strings and compares them as strings. When such an attribute is referenced in a filter, the comparison value is coerced through Ash.Type.Atom. Because the type defined no coerce/2 callback, coercion fell back to the default (cast_input/2), which calls String.to_atom/1 when the attribute is configured with the unsafe_to_atom?: true constraint. Filtering such an attribute with attacker-controlled strings therefore interned a new, permanent atom for every distinct value. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM caps the atom table, so an actor who can supply filter values for a public, filterable :atom attribute declared with unsafe_to_atom?: true can exhaust the atom table and crash the node (denial of service). AshPaperTrail is a notable example: its version resources expose a public, filterable version_action_name atom attribute with unsafe_to_atom?: true by default. The fix adds a coerce/2 to Ash.Type.Atom that never interns atoms — a comparison value is left as a string, since the type is stored and compared as a string. Setting the attribute from action input (cast_input/2, which still honors unsafe_to_atom?) is unchanged. This issue affects ash: from 3.5.1 before 3.34.3.
- CVSS
- 8.2 HIGH (v4.0, CNA)CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-770
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- 0.30% (percentile 21)
- Assigned by
- EEF
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Oct 6, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
ash-project ash ash-project:ash | from 3.5.1 before 3.34.3 | CNA record |
References
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-94201.htmlrelated, third-party-advisory
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-94201related
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/2970ba3bd5d36d6ad04c731ac87385375d457147related
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/5282f3f513053628cdd1bf2236ea22d975d934d4patch
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.