CVE-2026-93140udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects Linux. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty When an I/O error occurs while writing the Logical Volume Integrity Descriptor (LVID) buffer to the block device, the block layer's completion handler (`end_buffer_write_sync()`) clears the `BH_Uptodate` flag on the buffer. However, the buffer still contains valid LVID data in memory. If the filesystem is subsequently remounted read-write or synced, `udf_open_lvid()` or `udf_sync_fs()` will modify the LVID buffer and call `mark_buffer_dirty()`. This triggers a spurious `WARN_ON_ONCE(!buffer_uptodate(bh))` warning in `mark_buffer_dirty()` because the buffer is not marked uptodate, even though its in-memory contents are valid and are about to be overwritten. To prevent this spurious warning, unconditionally set the `BH_Uptodate` flag before calling `mark_buffer_dirty()` in `udf_open_lvid()` and `udf_sync_fs()`. This acknowledges that the in-memory buffer is valid and matches the workaround previously applied to `udf_close_lvid()` in commit 853a0c25baf9 ("udf: Mark LVID buffer as uptodate before marking it dirty"). Extending this workaround ensures consistent behavior across all LVID updates. Buffer I/O error on dev loop0, logical block 128, lost sync page write ------------[ cut here ]------------ !buffer_uptodate(bh) WARNING: fs/buffer.c:1087 at mark_buffer_dirty+0x299/0x410 fs/buffer.c:1087 ... Call Trace: <TASK> udf_open_lvid+0x369/0x5b0 fs/udf/super.c:2078 udf_reconfigure+0x336/0x540 fs/udf/super.c:679 reconfigure_super+0x232/0x8f0 fs/super.c:1080 vfs_cmd_reconfigure fs/fsopen.c:268 [inline] vfs_fsconfig_locked+0x171/0x320 fs/fsopen.c:297 __do_sys_fsconfig fs/fsopen.c:463 [inline] __se_sys_fsconfig+0x6b9/0x810 fs/fsopen.c:350 do_syscall_64+0x174/0x580 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 </TASK>
- CVSS
- Not yet scored
- Weakness (CWE)
- Not given
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- Linux
- NVD analysis
- Received
- Record last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
Linux Linux linux:linux (from the name) | from 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d before e6461ef34f91ad7dbffdf912b3d661a7dd892931; 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d builds before 359cea636f4a74a96c01a8050f155e12840c079a; from 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d before a4c4e38b356ad4c1f90478124922917489137c08; from 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d before 8034ddf4751d9143c5ef7eebe3d4f33218fdd378; from 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d before ee477e5204f764444e60699280abf5936c2a6ae6; 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d builds before 11afe1912140f79d5af3091a54b181ef72fce1a5; from 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d before c4058355d27488a3cd31c60c032335f77c4fdcfc; from 853a0c25baf96b028de1654bea1e0c8857eadf3d before fb0601134c7e51728bd098abc6909315de1e5d86; and 8 more ranges | CNA record |
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e6461ef34f91ad7dbffdf912b3d661a7dd892931
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/359cea636f4a74a96c01a8050f155e12840c079a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4c4e38b356ad4c1f90478124922917489137c08
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8034ddf4751d9143c5ef7eebe3d4f33218fdd378
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee477e5204f764444e60699280abf5936c2a6ae6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/11afe1912140f79d5af3091a54b181ef72fce1a5
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c4058355d27488a3cd31c60c032335f77c4fdcfc
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fb0601134c7e51728bd098abc6909315de1e5d86
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.