CVE-2026-92682@neo4j/graphql: authorization relationship and connection filters invert the "none" quantifier
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects Neo4j @neo4j/graphql. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.31%, higher than 23% of scored CVEs.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
In @neo4j/graphql versions from 7.0.0 up to but not including 7.6.4, the none quantifier in @authorization filters on relationships and connections is not negated when translated to Cypher, so it behaves like some. A rule such as "none of the related denied users matches the JWT subject" therefore returns exactly the records it was meant to exclude, and excludes those it was meant to return. An authenticated user whom such a rule is meant to deny can read the protected records. This is also the case for mutations, so the impact is that sensitive data could also be created and deleted by users that shouldn't have access according to the typedefs. Fixed in 7.6.4.
- CVSS
- 8.6 HIGH (v4.0, CNA)CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-863
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- 0.31% (percentile 23)
- Assigned by
- Neo4j
- NVD analysis
- Awaiting Analysis
- Record last updated
- Oct 16, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 12, 2026
Affected products
Neo4j @neo4j/graphql neo4j:graphql (from the name) | from 7.0.0 before 7.6.4 | CNA record |
References
- https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/security/advisories/GHSA-h873-p2wr-fjx6vendor-advisory
- https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/commit/17650cc370445a6bb9d394d34063d3623e987aa2patch
- https://github.com/neo4j/graphql/releases/tag/%40neo4j%2Fgraphql%407.6.4release-notes
- https://www.npmjs.com/package/@neo4j/graphqlproduct
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.