CVE-2026-90898Bifrost unauthenticated remote code execution via MCP stdio client registration
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects maximhq Bifrost. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Bifrost registers MCP clients through its management API. A stdio client is a command plus args. Bifrost starts that program in the gateway the moment the client is added. No MCP handshake required. The default is governance.auth_config.is_enabled=false. Auth off means every caller is a local admin. One unauthenticated POST /api/mcp/client is enough to run a program as the Bifrost process user (appuser on the official image). transports/v2.1.0 refuses an unauthenticated stdio registration with 403. transports/v2.0.0 still allows it.
- CVSS
- 9.8 CRITICAL (v3.1, CNA)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-306, CWE-284
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- JFROG
- NVD analysis
- Awaiting Analysis
- Record last updated
- Sep 14, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
maximhq Bifrost maximhq:bifrost (from the name) | before 2.1.0 | CNA record |
References
- https://github.com/maximhq/bifrost/pull/6757patch
- https://github.com/maximhq/bifrost/commit/12e170352bd25eab1ae9ba16611f1797d1fd8fdcpatch
- https://github.com/maximhq/bifrost/releases/tag/transports/v2.1.0release-notes
- https://github.com/maximhq/bifrostproduct
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.