Back to CVE records
Critical 9.8Published Sep 11, 2026

CVE-2026-89551SUNRPC: xdr_buf_trim: clamp buf->len to avoid underflow

Updated under an hour ago ()

Does this affect you?

It affects Linux. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.

No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: SUNRPC: xdr_buf_trim: clamp buf->len to avoid underflow xdr_buf_trim() trims `len` bytes from the tail of an xdr_buf by walking the tail, pages, and head iovecs. Each per-section step uses min_t() so it never removes more bytes than that section holds, but the final accounting at the fix_len label subtracts the total bytes actually consumed from buf->len without any clamp: fix_len: buf->len -= (len - trim); When the caller has set buf->len to a value smaller than the sum of the iov_lens, (len - trim) can exceed buf->len and the unsigned subtraction wraps to near UINT_MAX. gss_krb5_unwrap_v2() reaches xdr_buf_trim() in exactly that state: buf->head[0].iov_len -= GSS_KRB5_TOK_HDR_LEN + headskip; buf->len = len - (GSS_KRB5_TOK_HDR_LEN + headskip); xdr_buf_trim(buf, ec + GSS_KRB5_TOK_HDR_LEN + tailskip); buf->len is a small wire-derived value while the iov_lens are at page scale, so the per-section loops legitimately consume far more bytes than buf->len records. The wrapped buf->len then propagates as the authoritative stream bound into every downstream XDR decoder. Fix by clamping the decrement so buf->len bottoms out at zero: buf->len -= min_t(unsigned int, buf->len, len - trim); On the normal path where the iov_lens sum to buf->len, (len - trim) is always <= buf->len and the result is identical to before. No callers change behavior outside the underflow case.

CVSS
9.8 CRITICAL (v3.1, CNA)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
Not given
Known exploited
Not in CISA's KEV catalog
EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
Not loaded for this CVE
Assigned by
Linux
NVD analysis
Received
Record last updated
Oct 19, 2026
First seen by InfoSec Signals
Oct 9, 2026

Affected products

Affected products
Linux Linux
linux:linux (from the name)
from 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 before a3d77bcd974b8625d16bddf448cb3a1b5e37049c; from 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 before fa16bbe987b47e771e52eeb1b4540f18d92496ac; from 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 before a924ac4c78afab71bf82641afa3b62e0c4a8b55e; 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 builds before 4bf59cb0ea5b0ddfbc46a1dc2fa78fc8b9986ce4; from 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 before e6267cccd7b05cc514e57f2160aa8db85f5c2701; from 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 before ad0cce80d4af2f74674e8b635d97aa3880e83da8; from 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 before 85e9602650e9df07190abe817cee3b4d9bc3df17; 4c190e2f913f038c9c91ee63b59cd037260ba353 builds before 3f491306dcb673ff5e78e1044ba450c58978774e
CNA record

References

The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

Your cookie choices
We use essential cookies to run this site, and, only with your consent, an advertising cookie from Google to measure whether our ads lead to sign-ups and subscriptions. See our for details.