CVE-2026-81680openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 Authentication Bypass via Recovery Slot Removal
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects jahlives openssl_encrypt. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.9 fail to authenticate recovery-slot presence in envelope-format encrypted files, allowing attackers to remove recovery slots without re-encrypting the payload. Attackers can modify the file header to delete recovery-slot fields and bypass authentication, silently removing recovery paths the owner deliberately added.
- CVSS
- 4.0 MEDIUM (v3.1, CNA)CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-347
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- VulnCheck
- NVD analysis
- Analyzed
- Record last updated
- Oct 1, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
jahlives openssl_encrypt jahlives:openssl_encrypt (from the name) | before 1.4.9; 1.4.9 not affected | CNA record |
jahlives openssl_encrypt jahlives:openssl_encrypt | before 1.4.9 | NVD |
References
- https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-grhj-cpmg-f5mxvendor-advisory
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-1.4.9-authentication-bypass-via-recovery-slot-removalthird-party-advisory
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.