CVE-2026-81318Distinct-query aggregate drops the tenant schema prefix, leaking across tenants in AshSql
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects ash-project ash_sql. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash_sql allows a caller in a schema-based multitenant application to receive aggregate values computed from another tenant's rows. When an aggregate is computed over a distinct query, AshSql.AggregateQuery.add_single_aggs/5 rebuilds the outer query from query.from.source alone, which is only the {table, schema} tuple and does not carry query.prefix or query.from.prefix. For strategy(:context) multitenancy those hold the tenant schema, so the rebuilt outer query reads the repo's default schema while the inner correlated subquery still reads the tenant schema, and the two are joined only on primary key. The aggregate, and any relationship join added off the prefix-less binding, is then computed against the wrong tenant's rows. The neighbouring limit and exists branches instead wrap the query with subquery/1, which preserves the prefix. This issue affects ash_sql: from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1.
- CVSS
- 2.1 LOW (v4.0, CNA)CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-863
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- EEF
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Aug 31, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
ash-project ash_sql ash-project:ash_sql | from 0.1.0 before 0.7.1 | CNA record |
References
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql/security/advisories/GHSA-ww8j-58rc-f8h3vendor-advisory, related
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-81318.htmlrelated
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-81318related
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_sql/commit/3d95478cc9e1d5bfaf6144fe9b9793f29e5ab889patch
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.