Critical 9.8Published Aug 25, 2026

CVE-2026-79675NLTK before 3.10.3 JVM Argument Injection via Per-Call Options

Updated under an hour ago (2026-10-19 11:10 UTC)

Does this affect you?

It affects nltk. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.

No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.

Do this next

Start free and add your stack

Free account, 1 product

Every CVE for nltk

Exploited in the last 30 days

NLTK before 3.10.3 fails to validate JVM options passed through the per-call options parameter in the java() function, allowing attackers to inject dangerous JVM flags. Attackers can supply malicious options like -agentpath, -javaagent, or @argfile to Stanford wrapper classes to achieve arbitrary code execution.

CVSS: 9.8 CRITICAL (v3.1, CNA)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness (CWE): CWE-88
Known exploited: Not in CISA's KEV catalog
EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days): Not loaded for this CVE
Assigned by: VulnCheck
NVD analysis: Analyzed
Record last updated: Aug 27, 2026
First seen by InfoSec Signals: Oct 9, 2026

Affected products

Affected products

nltk nltk nltk:nltk (from the name)	before 3.10.3; 3.10.3 not affected	CNA record
nltk nltk nltk:nltk	before 3.10.3	NVD

References

https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-m4rf-3fr8-xwx3vendor-advisory, exploit, mitigation
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-before-jvm-argument-injection-via-per-call-optionsthird-party-advisory

The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry

The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.