CVE-2026-78699rename_tenant returns :ok on a failed rename, enabling cross-tenant access in AshPostgres
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects ash-project ash_postgres. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Unchecked Return Value vulnerability in ash-project ash_postgres allows a user who can drive a tenant rename to a name that collides with an existing tenant's schema to have their tenant record repointed at that other tenant's live schema, gaining access to its data. AshPostgres.MultiTenancy.rename_tenant/3 issues the ALTER SCHEMA ... RENAME TO ... with the non-raising Ecto.Adapters.SQL.query/2, discards its {:ok, _} | {:error, _} result, and unconditionally returns :ok. PostgreSQL rejects the rename when the target schema already exists (and on insufficient privilege or lock timeout), but that failure never reaches the caller. The calling manage_tenant update action therefore sees success and commits the tenant row with the new name, which is the schema of a different existing tenant, so subsequent reads and writes for that tenant run against the other tenant's data. This issue affects ash_postgres: from 0.25.0 before 2.13.0.
- CVSS
- 7.2 HIGH (v4.0, CNA)CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-252
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- EEF
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Sep 1, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
ash-project ash_postgres ash-project:ash_postgres | from 0.25.0 before 2.13.0 | CNA record |
References
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_postgres/security/advisories/GHSA-6fqq-j9c4-5766vendor-advisory, related
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-78699.htmlrelated
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-78699related
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_postgres/commit/8544ab15fe45784553c2d2da8ee1a388eee0174bpatch
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.