CVE-2026-77119NSEC3 insecure-referral proof can use unrelated cached NSEC3 RRsets
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects ISC BIND 9. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
A validly signed NSEC3 from an unrelated sibling zone may be accepted as an insecurity proof, downgrading a secure delegation and letting a forged unsigned answer through. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.27, 9.21.0 through 9.21.25, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1.
- CVSS
- 5.9 MEDIUM (v3.1, CNA)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-346
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- isc
- NVD analysis
- Awaiting Analysis
- Record last updated
- Sep 17, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
ISC BIND 9 isc:bind_9 (from the name) | from 9.11.0 through 9.18.50; from 9.20.0 through 9.20.27; from 9.21.0 through 9.21.25; from 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1; from 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.27-S1 | CNA record |
References
- https://kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2026-77119vendor-advisory
- https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.20.29patch
- https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.21.26patch
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.