Back to CVE records
High 7.5Published Sep 29, 2026

CVE-2026-72897Out-of-Bounds Access After SSL_set_SSL_CTX() During a Handshake

Updated under an hour ago ()

Does this affect you?

It affects OpenSSL. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.

EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.27%, higher than 17% of scored CVEs.

Issue summary: A TLS server that calls SSL_set_SSL_CTX() to switch a connection to a different SSL_CTX part way through a handshake may access memory beyond the end of an internal array if the replacement context knows about more provider signature algorithms than the context the connection was created from. Applications which never call SSL_set_SSL_CTX() are not affected. Impact summary: A remote peer may be able to cause a small out-of-bounds read, and in some circumstances a fixed-value out-of-bounds write, on the server heap. This may lead to a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-787: Out-of-bounds Write Description: A TLS connection records how many certificate slots it has when it is created, taken from the SSL_CTX that created it: the built-in certificate types plus one slot for each provider TLS-SIGALG entry that context was aware of. That count sizes an internal array of per-slot certificate validity flags. An application may replace a connection's SSL_CTX part way through the handshake by calling SSL_set_SSL_CTX(), most commonly from a servername callback in order to serve a different virtual host. Doing so did not refresh the recorded count. A provider signature algorithm's slot index is its position in the list of whichever context resolves it, so if the replacement context is aware of more of them than the original, an algorithm offered by the peer can resolve to an index beyond the end of the array. Processing the peer's signature algorithms then reads one four byte word past the end for each such algorithm and, where the word read is zero, writes a fixed value over it. A peer offering many of them can corrupt heap metadata and abort the process. Only provider signature algorithms which occupy one of the excess slots, and which the server also has configured, have this effect. Codepoints the replacement context does not recognise are discarded without being resolved to a slot, and provider signature algorithms are usable only from TLS 1.3. The two contexts must therefore be aware of different numbers of provider signature algorithms, which requires separate library contexts, a provider loaded between the two being created, or providers which differ in what they advertise - in 4.0, for example, the default provider advertises SM2 where the FIPS provider does not. A deployment meeting the condition is also unable to negotiate the affected algorithms with legitimate clients, since the same stale count hides the corresponding certificates, so the misconfiguration is likely to be noticed. For that reason, and because the configuration is not the default, this issue has been assessed as Low severity. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS
7.5 HIGH (v3.1, CISA ADP)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-787
Known exploited
Not in CISA's KEV catalog
EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
0.27% (percentile 17)
Assigned by
openssl
NVD analysis
Analyzed
Record last updated
Sep 29, 2026
First seen by InfoSec Signals
Oct 9, 2026

Affected products

Affected products
OpenSSL OpenSSL
openssl:openssl (from the name)
from 4.0.0 before 4.0.3; from 3.6.0 before 3.6.5; from 3.5.0 before 3.5.9; from 3.4.0 before 3.4.8
CNA record
openssl openssl
openssl:openssl
from 3.4.0 before 3.4.8; from 3.5.0 before 3.5.9; from 3.6.0 before 3.6.5; from 4.0.0 before 4.0.3
NVD

References

  • vendor-advisory
  • patch
  • patch
  • patch
  • patch

The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

Your cookie choices
We use essential cookies to run this site, and, only with your consent, an advertising cookie from Google to measure whether our ads lead to sign-ups and subscriptions. See our for details.