CVE-2026-70399httpd does not enforce the documented default max_clients connection limit
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects Erlang OTP. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Erlang/OTP inets httpd allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by opening and holding open a large number of connections. The max_clients option is documented to default to 150, and the inets hardening guide presents that limit as the first layer of denial-of-service defence, but a server that does not set it explicitly accepts an unlimited number of simultaneous connections. Establishing the connections is sufficient; no valid request and no authentication are required. The accept gate in httpd_manager:handle_new_connection/4 reads the option with httpd_util:lookup/2, which returns undefined when the key is absent, rather than the three-argument form carrying the 150 default that the neighbouring get_ustate/2 uses. Erlang term ordering places every integer before every atom, so the Count =< Max guard holds for any connection count and the server never returns {reject, busy}. Each accepted connection occupies a worker process and a socket for as long as it is held, driving the node towards process, memory and file descriptor exhaustion. Servers that set max_clients explicitly are unaffected, because a configured value is applied as intended. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2.
- CVSS
- 8.7 HIGH (v4.0, CNA)CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-770
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- EEF
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Sep 8, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
Erlang OTP erlang:erlang/otp | from 17.0 before 27.3.4.17; from 28.0 before 28.5.0.6; from 29.0 before 29.0.6 | CNA record |
References
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-pwvh-c689-f8q5vendor-advisory, related
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-70399.htmlrelated
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-70399related
- https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versionsx-version-scheme
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/d94a94c96eb4cccbd6f7d7da5975f0c035b69612patch
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/6746dc4e1df5257ad8ac91cbbd167cb8b0274ce7patch
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e0050fc00c500a4fa9ba1f594603c787ff6d20b2patch
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.