CVE-2026-6860A TCP client can perform a TLS handshake and present the server name extension with a server name that is accepted by a server wildcard name, e.g.
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects eclipse vert.x. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
A TCP client can perform a TLS handshake and present the server name extension with a server name that is accepted by a server wildcard name, e.g. if the server is configured with a certificate accepting *.example.com, any XYZ.example.com where xyz is a valid name can be used.
- CVSS
- 5.3 MEDIUM (v3.1, NVD)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-770, CWE-295
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- Not given
- NVD analysis
- Analyzed
- Record last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
eclipse vert.x eclipse:vert.x | from 4.3.4 through 4.5.26; from 5.0.0 through 5.0.11 | NVD |
References
- https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/pull/6102issue-tracking, patch
- https://github.com/eclipse-vertx/vert.x/security/advisories/GHSA-3g76-f9xq-8vp6exploit, vendor-advisory
- https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/vulnerability-reports/-/issues/381exploit, issue-tracking, third-party-advisory
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.