CVE-2026-6687FatFs R0.16 and earlier contains a stack overflow bug in f_getlabel() because exFAT label length (XDIR_NumLabel) is trusted without enforcing spec maximums.
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects elm-chan fatfs. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
FatFs R0.16 and earlier contains a stack overflow bug in f_getlabel() because exFAT label length (XDIR_NumLabel) is trusted without enforcing spec maximums. This maps to CWE-121 (Stack-based Buffer Overflow). Estimated CVSS v3.1 vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H (7.6, High). The estimated CISA SSVC vectors are Exploitation: PoC, Technical Impact: Total.
- CVSS
- 7.6 HIGH (v3.1, NVD)CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-121
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- Not given
- NVD analysis
- Analyzed
- Record last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
elm-chan fatfs elm-chan:fatfs | through r0.16 | NVD |
References
- https://elm-chan.org/fsw/ff/product
- https://github.com/runZeroInc/vulns-2026-fatfs-chancethird-party-advisory, exploit
- https://www.runzero.com/advisories/fatfs-exfat-label-len-of-cve-2026-6687/third-party-advisory
- https://www.runzero.com/blog/fatfs-bugs/third-party-advisory, exploit
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.