Back to CVE records
Medium 5.9Published May 20, 2026

CVE-2026-5947Undefined behavior may result due to a race condition leading to a use-after-free violation.

Updated under an hour ago ()

Does this affect you?

It affects isc bind. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.

No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.

Undefined behavior may result due to a race condition leading to a use-after-free violation. If BIND receives an incoming DNS message signed with SIG(0), it begins work to validate that signature. If, during that validation, the "recursive-clients" limit is reached (as would occur during a query flood), and that same DNS message is discarded per the limit, there is a brief window of time while the SIG(0) validation may attempt to read the now-discarded DNS message. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.20.0 through 9.20.22, 9.21.0 through 9.21.21, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1. BIND 9 versions 9.18.28 through 9.18.49 and 9.18.28-S1 through 9.18.49-S1 are NOT affected.

CVSS
5.9 MEDIUM (v3.1, NVD)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness (CWE)
CWE-362, CWE-416, CWE-367
Known exploited
Not in CISA's KEV catalog
EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
Not loaded for this CVE
Assigned by
Not given
NVD analysis
Modified
Record last updated
Aug 24, 2026
First seen by InfoSec Signals
Oct 9, 2026

Affected products

Affected products
isc bind
isc:bind
from 9.20.0 before 9.20.23; from 9.21.0 before 9.21.22
NVD

References

  • patch
  • patch
  • vendor-advisory

The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.

Your cookie choices
We use essential cookies to run this site, and, only with your consent, an advertising cookie from Google to measure whether our ads lead to sign-ups and subscriptions. See our for details.