CVE-2026-47160Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust.
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It lists no affected products yet. Add what you run and Signals checks it as products are added.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. Prior to 1.36.0, Vaultwarden's /icons/{domain}/icon.png endpoint used src/http_client.rs checks including should_block_address() and post_resolve() that missed decimal, hexadecimal, and octal IP representations, allowing SSRF through the icon-fetching HTTP client for blind internal network or port discovery. This issue is fixed in version 1.36.0.
- CVSS
- 5.8 MEDIUM (v3.1, NVD)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-918, CWE-1389
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- Not given
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Jul 15, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
No affected products are listed yet.
References
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/commit/a354e57659d26149fde0d91b76f83fce94e8f277
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/pull/7162
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/releases/tag/1.36.0
- https://github.com/dani-garcia/vaultwarden/security/advisories/GHSA-72vh-x5jq-m82g
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.