CVE-2026-44209Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a template language that makes sense.
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It lists no affected products yet. Add what you run and Signals checks it as products are added.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Banks generates meaningful LLM prompts using a template language that makes sense. Prior to 2.4.2, banks uses jinja2.Environment() (unsandboxed) to render prompt templates. Applications that pass user-supplied strings as the template argument to Prompt() are vulnerable to Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI), which can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the host system. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.4.2.
- CVSS
- 7.5 HIGH (v3.1, NVD)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-1336, CWE-917
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- Not given
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Jul 24, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
No affected products are listed yet.
References
- https://github.com/masci/banks/pull/74
- https://github.com/masci/banks/security/advisories/GHSA-gphh-9q3h-jgpp
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-44209
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481713
- https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-44209.json
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.