CVE-2026-32144Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification.
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects erlang/otp and 2 other products. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability in Erlang OTP public_key (pubkey_ocsp module) allows OCSP designated-responder authorization bypass via missing signature verification. The OCSP response validation in public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 does not verify that a CA-designated responder certificate was cryptographically signed by the issuing CA. Instead, it only checks that the responder certificate's issuer name matches the CA's subject name and that the certificate has the OCSPSigning extended key usage. An attacker who can intercept or control OCSP responses can create a self-signed certificate with a matching issuer name and the OCSPSigning EKU, and use it to forge OCSP responses that mark revoked certificates as valid. This affects SSL/TLS clients using OCSP stapling, which may accept connections to servers with revoked certificates, potentially transmitting sensitive data to compromised servers. Applications using the public_key:pkix_ocsp_validate/5 API directly are also affected, with impact depending on usage context. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/public_key/src/pubkey_ocsp.erl and program routines pubkey_ocsp:is_authorized_responder/3. This issue affects OTP from OTP 27.0 before OTP 28.4.2 and OTP 27.3.4.10, corresponding to public_key from 1.16 before 1.20.3 and 1.17.1.2, and ssl from 11.2 before 11.5.4 and 11.2.12.7.
- CVSS
- 7.4 HIGH (v3.1, NVD)CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-295, CWE-347
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- Not given
- NVD analysis
- Modified
- Record last updated
- Jul 24, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 9, 2026
Affected products
erlang erlang/otp erlang:erlang/otp | from 27.0 before 27.3.4.10; from 28.0 before 28.4.2 | NVD |
erlang erlang/public_key erlang:erlang/public_key | from 1.16 before 1.17.1.2; from 1.18 before 1.20.3 | NVD |
erlang erlang/ssl erlang:erlang/ssl | from 11.2 before 11.2.12.7; after 11.3 before 11.5.4 | NVD |
References
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32144.htmlmitigation, vendor-advisory
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/49033a6d93a5be0ee0dce04e1fb8b4ae7de1e0c0patch
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/ac7ff528be857c5d35eb29c7f24106e3a16d4891patch
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/security/advisories/GHSA-gxrm-pf64-99xmmitigation, third-party-advisory
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32144third-party-advisory
- https://www.erlang.org/doc/system/versions.html#order-of-versionsvendor-advisory
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32144
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2455896
- https://security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/vex/2026/cve-2026-32144.json
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.