CVE-2026-105283Internal error terms inspected into AshTypescript RPC error responses
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects ash-project ash_typescript. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
No exploitation reported and no EPSS estimate yet.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to read internal Elixir terms from an RPC error response by provoking an error the error builder has no dedicated clause for. AshTypescript.Rpc.ErrorBuilder.build_error_response/1 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/error_builder.ex renders a pipeline error term that matches no specific clause with inspect/1 and places the result in details.error of the client-facing error. Ash exceptions take a separate path in AshTypescript.Rpc.Errors where unhandled cases are redacted behind an errorId, but these fallbacks have no redaction, so whatever the term carries reaches the HTTP or channel response. Two request paths hand it such terms: a struct-typed action argument with an invalid nested value, where cast_map_to_struct/2 in lib/ash_typescript/rpc/input_formatter.ex throws the raw Ash.Type cast error into the builder, and field selection on a generic action that returns a primitive, where format_field_type/1 inspects the full Ash.Info.Manifest.Type struct into vars.returnType. Resource module names in vars.resource are not treated as sensitive and are out of scope. This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.1.0 before 0.19.1.
- CVSS
- 6.3 MEDIUM (v4.0, CNA)CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
- Weakness (CWE)
- CWE-209
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- Not loaded for this CVE
- Assigned by
- EEF
- NVD analysis
- Deferred
- Record last updated
- Oct 16, 2026
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 12, 2026
Affected products
ash-project ash_typescript ash-project:ash_typescript | from 0.1.0 before 0.19.1 | CNA record |
References
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript/security/advisories/GHSA-7gxc-w225-f7f3related, vendor-advisory
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-105283.htmlrelated
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-105283related
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript/commit/8e204ce34e24a158cf22a2dac4d53c44716c9e30related
- https://github.com/ash-project/ash_typescript/commit/4b3c65203ee78dc992d6d2e6559625c5460a01cdpatch
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.