CVE-2013-6825(1) movescu.cc and (2) storescp.cc in dcmnet/apps/, (3) dcmnet/libsrc/scp.cc, (4) dcmwlm/libsrc/wlmactmg.cc, (5) dcmprscp.cc and (6) dcmpsrcv.cc in dcmpstat/apps/, (7) dcmpstat/tests/msgserv.cc, and…
Updated under an hour ago ()
Does this affect you?
It affects offis dcmtk. Add what you run to find out whether that includes you.
EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.49%, higher than 41% of scored CVEs.
Do this next
Free account, 1 product
(1) movescu.cc and (2) storescp.cc in dcmnet/apps/, (3) dcmnet/libsrc/scp.cc, (4) dcmwlm/libsrc/wlmactmg.cc, (5) dcmprscp.cc and (6) dcmpsrcv.cc in dcmpstat/apps/, (7) dcmpstat/tests/msgserv.cc, and (8) dcmqrdb/apps/dcmqrscp.cc in DCMTK 3.6.1 and earlier does not check the return value of the setuid system call, which allows local users to gain privileges by creating a large number of processes.
- CVSS
- 7.2 HIGH (v2.0, NVD)AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
- Weakness (CWE)
- Not given
- Known exploited
- Not in CISA's KEV catalog
- EPSS (exploitation in the next 30 days)
- 0.49% (percentile 41)
- Assigned by
- mitre
- NVD analysis
- Modified
- Record last updated
- Aug 6, 2024
- First seen by InfoSec Signals
- Oct 12, 2026
Affected products
offis dcmtk offis:dcmtk | through 3.6.1; 3.5.1; 3.5.2; 3.5.2a; 3.5.3; 3.5.4; 3.6.0 | NVD |
References
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/532261/100/0/threadedmailing-list, x-refsource-bugtraq
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/126883/DCMTK-Privilege-Escalation.htmlx-refsource-misc, exploit
- http://secunia.com/advisories/58916third-party-advisory, x-refsource-secunia
- http://git.dcmtk.org/web?p=dcmtk.git%3Ba=blob%3Bf=CHANGES.361x-refsource-confirm
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/67784vdb-entry, x-refsource-bid
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2014/Jun/11mailing-list, x-refsource-fulldisc
The CVE record on cve.org NVD's entry
The CVE record is authoritative. Products marked “from the name” were identified from the CNA's free-text names, not a CPE, and are matched less certainly. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.